FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS
Here's a list of frequently asked questions about the airports
in general, the powers given to an airport board, and the powers
retained by Fiscal Court.
Q Can property be seized for airport
development expansion?
Kentucky Revised Statues (KRS),
Chapter 183.133 gives an Airport Board or any governmental unit
(Fiscal Court) the power to condemn land. There is a Kentucky
Supreme Court ruling that appears to take this power away from
an Airport Board. However, the board can simply ask the
Fiscal Court to seize the property—if required. To
date, the Fiscal Court has not gone on record to rule out this
possibility.
Q How did the Airport Board get
started?
In 2005, the Oldham County Chamber
of Commerce formed a subcommittee to examine the possibility
of building an airport. This was done at the request of then
Judge/Executive Mary Ellen Kinser. During 2006, this sbucommittee
became more formalized as an airport committee. Judge/Executive
Duane Murner appointed himself as a member of the airport committee
in January 2007, the same month he took office. In March,
2007, Murner formally appointed an Airport Board, thereby removing
himself from directly influencing airport board proceedings.
Q Who appointed the current Airport
Board, and what powers does it have?
The key issue here is
that airport board members are appointed by the Oldham County
Judge/Executive, a power given by KRS, chapter 183.132. Therefore,
the board is only accountable to the judge/executive. The
powers of an Airport Board are set by KRS chapter 183.133 & 183.135,
and include: The
power to acquire land; the
power to establish, maintain, and operate an airport; the
power to borrow money and use any airport property and facilities
as collateral; and the
power to build buildings, purchase airport-related equipment
Q Can a separate and unrestricted
airport tax be levied on our property?
Yes! KRS, chapter
183.134 states, “…Any
governmental unit may exclude the [airport] tax from consideration
in calculating the compensating tax rate…
Q Do general aviation airports have
the same security requirements as commercial airports?
No! In
2004, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued
Information Publication A-001, Security Guidelines for General
Aviation Airports. In
the executive summary for this publication, the TSA clearly states, “The
document does not contain regulatory language, nor is it intended
to suggest that any recommendations or guidelines should be considered
a mandatory requirement.”
Q Isn’t this
airport just another high risk investment of our tax dollars?
General
aviation airports are rarely self sufficient. The cost
of maintaining an infrastructure to support an airport is a cost
that the county will have to pay—year
after year. If the airport cannot generate enough revenue
to support day-to-day operations, then that is an additional
cost passed on to the taxpayer. In a GRA Inc. report to
the Shelby County Airport Committee, it was found that 13 airports
(including Bowman Field) rely heavily on federal, state, or private
grants in order to meet their annual budgets. None of this
money is guaranteed!
Q Are other general aviation airports
in/near the Greater Louisville area financially sound?
Bowman
Field and Clark County Regional airport are both facing financial
challenges. They are
the two largest general aviation airports in the area, and will
directly compete with an Oldham County airport. NOA is
currently looking at some of the financial indicators at both
Bowman Field and Clark County, and will give you an update when
more information is available.
Q How many airplanes will be based
at an Oldham County airport?
The Entran study forecast that
105 aircraft would relocate to Oldham County in the first year
of airport operations. Pilots who want this airport will
say there are over 200 aircraft ready to leave Bowman Field alone! However,
NOA believes both numbers are highly optimistic. The Entran
study (and some pilots) failed to take into consideration the
realities of market forces. Both Bowman Field and Clark
County airports will respond aggressively to maintain their share
of aircraft. That could mean reducing fuel prices, hangar
rentals, or both. Currently, there are only 69 aircraft
registered in Oldham County, but based elsewhere. There
are no guarantees that all will re-locate to and Oldham County
airport. So, the true answer to this question is, “We
really don’t know.” An unbiased, objective
analysis is needed.
Q What is the “health” of
general aviation?
Any general aviation airport depends
on a large number of private pilots flying in order to generate
revenue to pay for the airport. There are indications that
general aviation is indeed on the decline. Here are the
two most alarming facts:
- From
2003 to 2006, flying hours have dropped by nearly 3.2 million
hours, a 12% decline.
- Since
1980, there has been a 28% decline in certificated pilots. Of
particular note is a 13% drop in the number of private pilots. Private
pilot certification is the first step in a commitment to flying
on a long-term basis.
Q Will general aviation airports
increase pollution levels in Oldham County?
The short answer
is yes. There
will be increased air, noise, light, and environmental pollution
introduced, that currently does not exist in Oldham County. However,
the problem is that the issue of pollution has been highly politicized,
and studies are used by both sides to support their positions. It
is NOA’s opinion, however, that the pollution introduced
by an airport is unacceptable.
Q I have heard that
aircraft still use gas that contains lead. Doesn’t
that cause a lead hazard?
Aviation fuel contains lead, and
aviation is one of the last few areas where the EPA has failed
to set a timetable for change to unleaded fuel. The use
of leaded aviation gasoline results in the emission lead contaminants. Areas
surrounding airports are especially contaminated, due to the
high volume of air traffic. However, lead contaminants
can end up far from airports, due to wind patterns, and deposited
in farm lands, streams, and surrounding neighborhoods. So,
Oldham County residents will face a greater exposure to lead,
if an airport is built.
Q Will an airport affect property
values?
Again, the short answer is yes. However,
it is more difficult to determine an exact dollar amount. There
are studies which show the level of financial impact depends
on how close your home is to the airport. NOA has a group
of real estate experts working on a detailed analysis of this
issue. We believe they have more expertise than the Airport
Board has to conduct this study.
Q Is general aviation flying safe?
That
depends on who you ask. If
you ask a pilot, he or she will say yes, and have facts and figures
to prove it. If you ask the folks in Corona, California,
where two aircraft recently collided and rained bodies and debris
across a neighborhood, you wouldn't get the same answer. So,
safety is a subjective word. What is safe to one person
may be unsafe to another.
NOA believes that there is
a higher risk of accidents in general aviation flying, when compared
to commercial aviation. In fact, the general aviation accident
rate is 80 times higher than commercial aviation. The reason
for this is clear: lower
experience level of the pilots flying; more
takeoffs and landings are performed (where the risk of accident
is higher); less
weather-tolerant aircraft (can't avoid the weather as easily
as airliners); and limited
cockpit resources and flight support
Finally, a general aviation airport will bring
a higher risk of aircraft accidents to the county, since the only
current risk of accidents comes from aircraft maneuvering overhead. When
an airport is built, aircraft will be exposed to accidents during
many more phases of flight--including takeoff, climb, approach,
and landing. Not all of these accidents will occur on airport property. |


|