AIRPORT ANALYSIS

After you read the Analysis, click HERE to read our evaluation

This report takes an objective look at the Proposed Oldham County Airport Report (hereafter referred to as the feasibility study).  Simply stated, the facts in the feasibility study do not support the conclusions.

Executive Summary
In this report, you will find a discussion that supports the following statements:

  • The feasibility study primarily uses a survey to determine the initial number and type of aircraft that might be based in Oldham County.  The survey simply asks if a pilot would consider moving/basing his/her aircraft to Oldham County.  There is absolutely no commitment from this type of survey, so there is nothing to lose by responding positively.  A more accurate determination of aircraft basing would be to construct a “generic” Kentucky airport, and adjust it for Oldham County population and median family income variables.
  • Sources of revenue—fuel sales, hangar rental, and flight training operations—are assumed to provide the bulk of the revenue to pay for the operating costs of an airport.  However, market forces will dictate what can be charged for fuel, hangars, and flight instruction.  The general aviation pilot is very sensitive to price changes, and will shop for the best rates.  This will impact the airport’s ability to dictate fuel prices and keep its hangars at 100% occupancy.
  • One of the weakest sections of this feasibility report is its business user survey.  Out of 415 delivered surveys, only 5 aircraft owners (1%) said they would use an Oldham County airport.  Only one said he would move his aircraft to Oldham County.  All other responses in this section of the feasibility study came from the same 5 surveys!  Finally, all survey data came from businesses already in Oldham County!  Based on such a small survey sample, it is impossible to extrapolate any conclusions on the amount of revenue generated by corporate flying activity.
  • There are several items not adequately addressed in the feasibility study, or not addressed at all.  A discussion of market response to an Oldham County airport is missing.  We will compete for aircraft with surrounding airports.  Each airport relies on its customer base to hopefully cover most of the annual operating costs.  Additionally, no meaningful discussion concerning environmental impact of aircraft is attempted.    Finally, the first page of the feasibility study attempts to sell the airport as a safety measure for aircraft maneuvering over Oldham County.  In fact, the risk of an aircraft accident on Oldham County soil goes up considerably once an airport is built.
  • There are some unfavorable trends in general aviation that must be considered before building an airport:  Since 2000, there are fewer student pilots, private pilots, and commercial pilots receiving certification.  From 2003 to 2006, there has been a 3.2 million hour decrease in general aviation flying, especially in single engine and multi-engine piston aircraft. -OUR EVALUATION-

Rural Airport

Aeroflex Airport